Teams

Goy 6.5 Combo 40s Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Kimberly Franz vs Megan Noltemeyer / Karoleigh Allred4-6, 4-6
2023-09-25vs Pressley 6.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Franz / Blythe Murphy vs Lorri Stephenson / Lara Heberle6-1, 7-5
2023-08-31vs Manning 6.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tewksbury / Blythe Murphy vs Patty Dutton / Mariann Van Ryen7-5, 7-5
2023-08-19vs Yates 6.5 Combo 40s ThursWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tewksbury / Blythe Murphy vs Serena Igharas / Samantha Price6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.73
Laura Hertweck
published
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.36
Blythe Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Thais Warwar
published
3.31
Linda Hestenes
published
3.20
Lucy Callahan
published
2.85
Cheryl Rankin
published 3
2.64
Catherine Davis
published 3
Jennifer Tewksbury
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Cheryl Rankin + Thais Warwar3257% games−1.1% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
Laura Hertweck
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Thais Warwar
30W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Lucy Callahan
12W–22L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Cheryl Rankin
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Catherine Davis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
2.64
Jennifer Tewksbury
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.