Teams

Craig/Lassow - W24 Double Bagel

2024 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-14vs Jilek/Elfstrum WinterLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Peter Kimball vs Dave Malek / Alan Stratton4-6, 4-6
2024-02-29vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 40+ WinterLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Joel Sutton vs Chandha Duwearatchi / John Simon1-6, 6-7
2024-02-22vs Tuplano/Ostlund: TBC 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Allen / Brian Reidinger vs Julian Bannach / Bhavin Trivedi2-6, 3-6
2024-02-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Reidinger vs James Egberg7-6, 6-3
2024-02-08vs Tuplano/Ostlund: TBC 4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrian Reidinger vs Julian Bannach4-6, 4-6
2024-02-01vs Goodman: Swillers W24Won 10
W#4 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Philip Green vs Paul Dalton / Mark Sulzbach6-3, 7-6
2024-01-25vs Schoenecker - ChaseLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Aloisio Lovo vs Eran Singer / Paul Schoenecker3-6, 3-6
2024-01-11vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 40+ WinterLost 01
L#4 DoublesJeff Craig / Brian Reidinger vs Mark Gness / John Simon0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Victor Tonelli
published
3.77
Aloisio Lovo
published 4
3.74
Brian Reidinger
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Peter Kimball
published
3.68
Joel Sutton
published
3.65
Jonathan Farber
published
3.65
Philip Green
published
3.36
Jeff Sprinkel
published
3.30
Jeff Craig
published
3.27
Robert MacHalek
published
Gordon Strom
published
Kaushik Joshi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Sprinkel + Robert MacHalek2343% games+4.8% vs expected
Joel Sutton + Peter Kimball2344% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Sprinkel + Victor Tonelli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victor Tonelli
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Aloisio Lovo
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Brian Reidinger
92W–175L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Peter Kimball
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Joel Sutton
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jonathan Farber
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Philip Green
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
Jeff Sprinkel
15W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Jeff Craig
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Robert MacHalek
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Gordon Strom
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kaushik Joshi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.