Teams

40 - Love

2022 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-28vs ACACLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Beckham / Judith Divita vs Susan Bayliss / Beverly Sweeney3-6, 5-7
2022-07-26vs BHSCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Jeanne Ward vs Belinda Blankenship / Maya Mathew2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Gunnels / Jane Fletcher vs Kelly Trout / Laura Futty6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-21vs Keswick/GlenmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Jan Carroll vs Melissa Zeller / Kathleen Long4-6, 4-6
2022-07-18vs ACACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Jan Carroll vs Susan Bayliss / Anita Sowers7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Gunnels / Rose Ballard vs Esther Bausserman / Beth Hollen4-6, 4-6
2022-07-07vs Forest LakesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJan Carroll / Judith Divita vs Kathy Huddleston / Noel Jorgensen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Fletcher / Elizabeth Gunnels vs Jenny Furlow / Mary Beth Cancienne2-6, 5-7
2022-06-30vs BHSCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Jan Carroll vs Heidi Binko / Carrie Cooper1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gunnels / Rose Ballard vs Melissa Hoover / Pascale Hapgood3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-28vs Keswick/GlenmoreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Jan Carroll vs Tia Schurecht / Marcy MacGovern6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Gunnels / Rose Ballard vs Janie Shrader / Melissa Zeller5-7, 3-6
2022-06-16vs Forest LakesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudith Divita / Carolyn Beckham vs Stacy Moren / Mary Beth Cancienne4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Judith Divita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jeanne Ward
published
2.96
Carolyn Beckham
published 3.5
2.96
Maggie Nguyen
published
2.93
Elizabeth Gunnels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Jan Carroll
published 3
2.67
Leah Burger
published
2.57
Patricia Foley
published
Jane Fletcher
published
Martha Donnelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Divita + Elizabeth Gunnels2846% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Judith Divita
57W–126L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Jeanne Ward
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Carolyn Beckham
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Maggie Nguyen
5W–20L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Gunnels
95W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Jan Carroll
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Leah Burger
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Patricia Foley
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jane Fletcher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Donnelly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.