Teams

ATC VAN VLAKE

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-17vs CCC LEONARDWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeo Vibal / Christopher Chen vs Garrett Podell / Cory Boggess6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRob Romero vs Adam Furman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Webb / John Spann vs Joshua Leonard / Andrew Scott6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Fite vs Ryan Seaver6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMARK SILKO / Joseph Collier vs Ryan Rubenkoenig / David Nolan0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Robert Fite
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Rob Romero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Gerald Webb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
John Spann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
2.99
Scott Pulliam
published
2.99
Nam Le
published
2.92
MATTHEW HAVLIK
published
2.90
Emanuel Perez
published
2.57
Joseph Collier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kent Rasmussen
published
Leo Vibal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
MARK SILKO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Zhu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher van Vlake + Gerald Webb3937% games−4.7% vs expected
Christopher van Vlake + Scott Pulliam033 matchesnot enough data
Scott Pulliam + Gerald Webb033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Fite
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Rob Romero
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Gerald Webb
4W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
John Spann
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Christopher van Vlake
6W–20L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Scott Pulliam
3W–26L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Nam Le
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
MATTHEW HAVLIK
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.92
Emanuel Perez
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
Joseph Collier
4W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.57
Kent Rasmussen
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leo Vibal
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
MARK SILKO
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mike Zhu
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.