Teams

LS:55& 8.0:Roth

2022 ECT Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-20vs GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/WoodsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarl Reidemeister / Josie Jordan vs Christian Appleman / Catherine Dinauer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Dehesa / Laurie Zrenda vs Philip Dinauer / Pamelia Parker3-6, 4-6
2022-05-13vs GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Ward / David Hill vs Leslie Palumbo / Steve Godiksen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMartha Merrill / Robert Gay vs Pamelia Parker / Philip Goetz4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Pye / Albert Kirwan vs Dani Woods / Philip Dinauer1-6, 1-6
2022-05-06vs GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/WoodsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Chamberlain / David Roth vs Catherine Dinauer / Christian Appleman5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJosie Jordan / Carl Reidemeister vs Deborah Montenegro / Robert Montenegro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Zrenda / Albert Kirwan vs Celia Ponvert / Matthew Hall4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-08vs GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/WoodsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Roth / Debra Chamberlain vs Philip Dinauer / Dani Woods7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Hill / Leah Ward vs Robert Montenegro / Deborah Montenegro6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Gay / Martha Merrill vs Philip Goetz / Pamelia Parker3-6, 0-6
2022-03-25vs GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Roth / Debra Chamberlain vs Steve Godiksen / Leslie Palumbo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas la Fauci / Camille Burlingham vs Christian Appleman / Catherine Dinauer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlbert Kirwan / Connie Hurtt vs Philip Dinauer / Pamelia Parker2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:Get Off My Lawn!:Ponvert/Woods0512310116
2LS:55& 8.0:Roth0531225153

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Roth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Laura Palumbo
published
3.74
Laurie Zrenda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Lisa Mazzucco
published
3.56
Albert Kirwan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Martha Merrill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Leah Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Robert Gay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Connie Hurtt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Camille Burlingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debra Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Beth Pye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.65
Josie Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anthony Dehesa
published
Carl Reidemeister
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas la Fauci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Roth + Debra Chamberlain11356% gamesnot enough data
Leah Ward + Carl Reidemeister5070% gamesnot enough data
Connie Hurtt + David Roth5065% gamesnot enough data
Albert Kirwan + Debra Chamberlain123 matchesnot enough data
Robert Gay + Martha Merrill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Roth
27W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Palumbo
16W–14L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
Laurie Zrenda
52W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Lisa Mazzucco
158W–114L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Albert Kirwan
56W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Martha Merrill
36W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Leah Ward
135W–152L career · 2 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
Robert Gay
61W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Connie Hurtt
148W–133L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Camille Burlingham
80W–60L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Debra Chamberlain
51W–41L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Beth Pye
42W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Josie Jordan
34W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Anthony Dehesa
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Carl Reidemeister
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas la Fauci
19W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.