Teams

Racqueteers

2025 Prince Georges Combo · Prince Georges Combo 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-21vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesLadonna Griffith-Lesesne / Maria Miller vs Nikki Rawls / Natalie Walker1-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs LoVV 5.5 ComboLost 02
L#2 DoublesTara Burke / Danielle Tiley vs Donna Myers / Keilia Phillips7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEveline Shum / Tracie Hill vs Shanna Denbow / Kimberly Smith7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs Lady Acers 5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEveline Shum / Susan Timoney vs Annette James / Kameko Jones1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Tiley / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Oteal Griffin / Dayesha Sims3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-18vs No LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Tiley / Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne vs Paige Chapman / Sabine Balzora6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCalle Cone / Theresa Henderson vs Gale Powell / Latonya Lewis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-05vs LoVV 5.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracie Hill / Eveline Shum vs Constance Manning / Esme Rogers6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Tiley / Maria Miller vs Keilia Phillips / ANEESAH WILLIAMS6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCalle Cone / Lourdes Sanchez vs Kelly Kennedy / Kamilah House4-6, 4-6
2025-10-03vs Lady Acers 5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEveline Shum / Susan Timoney vs Cortney Mukushi / Dayesha Sims1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Tracie Hill
published
2.62
Danielle Tiley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Maria Miller
published
2.55
Calle Cone
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Eveline Shum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Lourdes Sanchez
published
2.32
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Susan Timoney
published
2.14
Theresa Henderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Sanchez + Tracie Hill2337% games−3.7% vs expected
Eveline Shum + Lourdes Sanchez134 matchesnot enough data
Calle Cone + Danielle Tiley213 matchesnot enough data
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne + Danielle Tiley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracie Hill
43W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Danielle Tiley
33W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Maria Miller
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.60
3
Calle Cone
42W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Eveline Shum
46W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Lourdes Sanchez
32W–45L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
39W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Susan Timoney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Theresa Henderson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.