Teams

GOLD RIVER RC CW8.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-28vs MILLER PK CW8.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Kelsey / Sabrina Cheng vs Emma Patterson / Faye Patterson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXuan Li / Karen Edling vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Maria Richardson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIrene Stafford / Angelina Eidemeiller vs Melissa Sloan / Jennie Parker6-1, 6-2
2025-09-13vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesXuan Li / Amy Putty vs Emma Patterson / Maria Richardson6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Selover / Heather Burnham vs Laura Newby / Tracy Quilala2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim Kelsey / Sabrina Cheng vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Maria Paradis2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Allison Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Brianna Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Xuan Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Lizban Habte
published
3.87
Amy Putty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Karen Edling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Donna Kaneko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Sophia Taber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Irene Stafford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Angelina Eidemeiller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Maria Costa
published
3.66
Kim Kelsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Heather Burnham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Laurie Selover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Irenessa Oliva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Victoria Eidemiller
published
3.44
Soo Pae
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irenessa Oliva + Soo Pae7264% games+15.5% vs expected
Amy Putty + Irene Stafford5056% games+7.7% vs expected
Amy Putty + Laurie Selover3550% games−1.6% vs expected
Heather Burnham + Laurie Selover0636% games−2.2% vs expected
Irene Stafford + Victoria Eidemiller4250% games−3.1% vs expected
Maria Costa + Heather Burnham2538% gamesnot enough data
Maria Costa + Laurie Selover033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Bartlett
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.55
4.5
Brianna Schneider
4W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Xuan Li
45W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Lizban Habte
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Amy Putty
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Karen Edling
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Donna Kaneko
10W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Sophia Taber
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Irene Stafford
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Angelina Eidemeiller
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maria Costa
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kim Kelsey
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Heather Burnham
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Laurie Selover
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Irenessa Oliva
41W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Victoria Eidemiller
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Soo Pae
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.