Teams

VALLEY CHURCH 40MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-03Split 11
W#1 DoublesWei Jing / Joy MENG vs Garret Seevers / Vilma Fernandez6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHarrison Tsang / Vanessa Graciano vs Craig Denamur / Isabelle Fateh5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-27vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX8.0ESplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Yang / David Ho vs Anthony Chaba / Yukari Saito1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Lu / Fang Wong vs Johnny Vuong / Sarah Speakman7-5, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Mitch Hu
published
4.03
Guibin Tian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Joy MENG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Jie Kong
published
3.88
Yan Moore
published
3.84
Wei Zhou
published
3.84
Amy Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Haihua Yan
published
3.79
Andrew Lu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Paul Xie
published
3.76
Wei Jing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Vanessa Graciano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
David Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Qi Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Harrison Tsang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Fang Wong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Bing Cai
published 3.5
Hesheng Li
published
Sandy Yao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Yao + Haihua Yan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch Hu
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Guibin Tian
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.03
Joy MENG
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Jie Kong
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Yan Moore
27W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Wei Zhou
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Amy Yang
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Haihua Yan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Andrew Lu
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Paul Xie
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Wei Jing
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Vanessa Graciano
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
David Ho
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Qi Zhou
32W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Harrison Tsang
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Fang Wong
37W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Bing Cai
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Hesheng Li
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Yao
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.