Teams

Northern/Neddermeyer/18&Over2.5W

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-08vs Frakes: Lucille 2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnu Li / Faith Torcuator vs Abbey Rosen / Susie Kaufman6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLizabeth Sjaastad vs Claire Carlson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNina Larson Weber / Teresa Ripple vs Katie Stern / Julie Greenbaum6-0, 6-4
2025-07-01vs Leflay / RennerWon 30
W#1 DoublesNina Larson Weber / Shreya Shivkumar vs Cindy Bergstrom / Ranita Quale7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFaith Torcuator vs Rana Khoury6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Sand / Anu Li vs Mary Ann Bothe / Kristin Renner6-1, 6-1
2025-06-24vs Holland 18+ S25Won 21
W#1 DoublesFaith Torcuator / Jo Lynn Bucki vs Jennie Brinkworth / Jenny Nate Cornelia6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAnu Li vs Kelly Herrera3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesShreya Shivkumar / Nina Larson Weber vs Jennifer Nordeng / Elizabeth Holland6-4, 6-4
2025-06-17vs Sackrison: Minnetonka 2.5 LadiesLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Ripple / Lizabeth Sjaastad vs Jacqueline Parr / Laura Benson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFaith Torcuator vs Dzung Nguyen6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJo Lynn Bucki / Anu Li vs Hannah Holwell / Lynlee Critz2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJo Lynn Bucki / Shreya Shivkumar vs Sarah Reinhart / Amy Graves6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLizabeth Sjaastad vs Arianna Harmon6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Sand / Diane Horak vs Jennifer Voegele / Jennifer Kennedy6-2, 6-4
2025-06-07vs Frakes: Lucille 2.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLizabeth Sjaastad / Anita Hruby vs Abbey Rosen / Susie Kaufman3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShreya Shivkumar vs Claire Carlson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Sand / Teresa Ripple vs Betsy Butwin / Sara Frakes6-1, 6-3
2025-05-27vs Leflay / RennerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJo Lynn Bucki / Lizabeth Sjaastad vs Rana Khoury / Laura Schurhamer7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShreya Shivkumar vs Miriam Deskin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNina Larson Weber / Sarah Sand vs Mary Ann Bothe / Cindy Bergstrom7-5, 6-1
2025-05-20vs Holland 18+ S25Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Hruby / Nina Larson Weber vs Kelsey Shrader / Kelly Herrera6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnu Li vs Mary McDermott1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFaith Torcuator / Diane Horak vs Elizabeth Holland / Jennie Brinkworth6-2, 6-3
2025-05-13vs Sackrison: Minnetonka 2.5 LadiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesShreya Shivkumar / Sarah Sand vs Jacqueline Parr / Deb Sackrison3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesFaith Torcuator vs Angie Coplan5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Larson Weber / Jo Lynn Bucki vs Missy Monson / Lisa Katalinich4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLizabeth Sjaastad / Sarah Sand vs Sarah Reinhart / Jennifer Voegele6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShreya Shivkumar vs Arianna Harmon6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Hruby / Anu Li vs Antonelli Lindsay / Uyen Pham6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Shreya Shivkumar
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.44
Faith Torcuator
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.39
Lisa Neddermeyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anita Hruby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Nina Larson Weber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Anu Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Jo Lynn Bucki
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.02
Sarah Sand
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Diane Horak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lizabeth Sjaastad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Teresa Ripple
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shreya Shivkumar + Nina Larson Weber303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shreya Shivkumar
14W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Faith Torcuator
21W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Lisa Neddermeyer
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Anita Hruby
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Larson Weber
10W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Anu Li
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jo Lynn Bucki
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Sarah Sand
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Diane Horak
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizabeth Sjaastad
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Ripple
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.