Teams

Ravens

2025 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs Hit & RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Klocek / Chris Matlock vs Khalil Harris / Kunle Gbadamosi6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-26vs Acers 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Klocek / Jim Wiseman vs Charlie JONES / Rodney Moore7-6, 3-5
2025-07-12vs Hit & RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Klocek / TIMOTHY JONES vs EDWARD CHATTERS / Ellery Payton Jr7-6, 6-2
2025-07-11vs Acers 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesTIMOTHY JONES / Chris Klocek vs Raymond Lyons / Robert L George Jr6-3, 6-3
2025-06-29vs Acers 3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesChet Thompson / Chris Klocek vs Mario Walker / Melvin Williams3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Shelton / Jim Wiseman vs Issac Mance / William Ramos6-4, 6-1
2025-06-21vs Hit & RunWon 20
W#1 SinglesJim Wiseman vs Kunle Gbadamosi6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Klocek / TIMOTHY JONES vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tia Briscoe
published 4
2.89
Lam Huynh
published
2.86
Mark Holt
published
2.85
Chris Klocek
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Jim Wiseman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Waldo Ford
published
2.79
Michael Bolden
published
2.79
Chet Thompson
published 3
Chris Matlock
published 3
2.59
Brian Stanley
published 3
Michael Shelton
published
TIMOTHY JONES
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Klocek + Jim Wiseman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tia Briscoe
285W–132L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lam Huynh
24W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Mark Holt
3W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Chris Klocek
29W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Jim Wiseman
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Waldo Ford
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Michael Bolden
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Chet Thompson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Chris Matlock
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian Stanley
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Michael Shelton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
TIMOTHY JONES
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.