Teams

Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-15Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesGina Anderson / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Tema Laussen / Kimberly Lee1-6, 1-6
2021-12-08vs Sports Mall-Henderson/KnowltonLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesRaquel Moss / Shannon Fredericks vs Debra Knowlton / Stacy Criddle1-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesLiz Rowley / Jill Marsh vs DeeAnn Henderson / Yoko Walljasper0-6, 1-6
2021-12-01vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesCarrie Jensen / Raquel Moss vs Mary Peterson / Candy Friedli6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesBeatriz Velazquez / Shannon Fredericks vs Stef Charlesworth / Mari Bickmore6-4, 6-3
L#3 Female DoublesLaRicia Belliston / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Jocelyn Bennion / Kristin Finlayson5-7, 2-4
2021-11-17vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-WolfgramLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesGina Anderson / Liz Rowley vs Paula Naatz / Whitney Fautin3-6, 1-6
2021-11-10vs Sports Mall-Rollins/BradleyWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesRaquel Moss / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Female DoublesShannon Fredericks / Beatriz Velazquez vs Desi Lewis / Jacqueline Likes7-5, 2-1
2021-11-03vs Ogden-Cox/JohnstunSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesLiz Rowley vs Lindsay Andersen1-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesLaRicia Belliston / Laura Wills-Mitchell vs Jacki Joseph / Wendy Johnstun2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Henderson/Knowlton602225107
2Golds Gym-TC United6019511127
3Ace Athletics-Bastian5016412129
4Park City MARC-Smith/Byrne4113716154
5CMTA @ Liberty Park-Wolfgram4215920166
6CMTA @ Liberty Park-Hurd/Maxfield31142682
7Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson3391531221
8Ivory Ridge-McCord2261021153
9Ogden-Cox/Johnstun2311922183
10RISE AC - Price/Kemp24101430208
11Golds Gym-Page1351124157
12Red Ledges-Overton/Maddox1451531198
13CMTA @ Liberty Park-Mecham000000
14Sports Mall-Majors/Jensen0551534207
15Sports Mall-Rollins/Bradley0521838214
16Salt Lake Tennis-Bickmore0642040255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jill Marsh
published
3.21
Liz Rowley
usually #1 Female Singles 33%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Shannon Fredericks
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Cherylin Winkel
published 3.5
2.87
Raquel Moss
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Carrie Jensen
published 3
Gina Anderson
published 3
2.57
Laura Wills-Mitchell
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
LaRicia Belliston
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Karen Murray
published
Kim Ward
published
Mandy Petersen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Rowley + Mandy Petersen6267% games+10.6% vs expected
Liz Rowley + Jill Marsh16265% games+8.5% vs expected
LaRicia Belliston + Shannon Fredericks4163% games+7.6% vs expected
Laura Wills-Mitchell + Beatriz Velazquez6457% games+5.8% vs expected
Beatriz Velazquez + Jill Marsh7163% games+5.4% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Cherylin Winkel161056% games+4.5% vs expected
LaRicia Belliston + Raquel Moss121551% games+1.0% vs expected
Shannon Fredericks + Beatriz Velazquez5158% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Marsh
100W–41L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Liz Rowley
98W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Shannon Fredericks
89W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Raquel Moss
123W–111L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Carrie Jensen
138W–169L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Beatriz Velazquez
58W–39L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Gina Anderson
46W–64L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Laura Wills-Mitchell
74W–104L career · 4 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
LaRicia Belliston
85W–115L career · 2 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
Karen Murray
56W–61L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kim Ward
2W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mandy Petersen
18W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.