Teams

5 Raintree Kallam

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-09-04vs 4 ACAC - HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Ram Raghavan vs Ben Hall / Gabriel Venturi1-6, 3-6
2024-08-28vs 2 Woodlake EstesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuis Rodriguez-Miranda / Brett Sinsabaugh vs Eric Estes / Chris Grinnell0-6, 0-2
2024-08-27vs 5 Hermitage BlankleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Steve Hamant / Todd Furbee6-3, 6-3
2024-08-21vs 7 Bon Air - Reprobates - WadeWon 10
W#1 DoublesSeunghun Ok / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Warren Smigo / Christopher Wade6-4, 6-3
2024-08-14vs 1 MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Preservati / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Wheeler Dey / Adam Hamilton1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Charles Means / Scott Broaddus4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-07vs 3 MAC Captain Morgans StandLost 01
L#1 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Ram Raghavan vs Craig Morgan / David Roberts1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-05vs 1 MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Brad Houff vs Andrew Zima / Ryan Politowicz6-7, 6-7
2024-07-31vs 8 Ridgetop BlouchSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLuis Rodriguez-Miranda / Brett Sinsabaugh vs Sean Reynolds / Byron Holmes7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobert Preservati / Bhargavaram Kallam vs William Pilc / Robert Turner3-6, 2-6
2024-07-29vs 7 Bon Air - Reprobates - WadeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrett Sinsabaugh / Luis Rodriguez-Miranda vs Scott Kim / Warren Smigo6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Brett Sinsabaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Lee Brooks
published
3.80
Ram Raghavan
published
3.75
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.66
Seunghun Ok
published
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.36
Theo Prestia
published
3.35
Victor Tubungbanua
published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
Gary Wills
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Brooks + Bhargavaram Kallam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brett Sinsabaugh
124W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
Lee Brooks
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Ram Raghavan
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–87L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Seunghun Ok
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Theo Prestia
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Victor Tubungbanua
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.