Teams

Thompson 9.0 55+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-31vs Two girls short of a threesomeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBob Weickgenannt / Lee Wroe vs David Stepherson / Richard McMichael6-4, 2-0
L#3 DoublesCurtis Cavey / Dan Morgan vs Doug DeLawter / Jeffrey Fowle6-7, 5-7
2022-08-14vs Two girls short of a threesomeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBob Weickgenannt / Lee Wroe vs Ray Stewart / Gary McManis6-4, 6-1
2022-08-08vs Two girls short of a threesomeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBob Weickgenannt / Curtis Cavey vs Doug DeLawter / Paul Morgenthau6-7, 4-4
2022-08-04vs Two girls short of a threesomeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCurtis Cavey / Gary Coiro vs Jeffrey Fowle / Ray Stewart2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Wroe / Bob Weickgenannt vs Greg Merril / Larry Dechter3-6, 1-6
2022-07-29vs Two girls short of a threesomeWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Bass / Lee Wroe vs John Olson / Dwayne Herndon6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCurtis Cavey / Gary Coiro vs Doug DeLawter / James Smoot6-1, 6-4
2022-07-24vs Two girls short of a threesomeWon 10
W#3 DoublesLee Wroe / Eric Bass vs John Olson / Dwayne Herndon6-4, 6-1
2022-07-06vs Two girls short of a threesomeWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Bass / Lee Wroe vs Nicholas Colletti / Jeffrey Fowle6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-04vs Two girls short of a threesomeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDan Morgan / Lee Wroe vs Larry Dechter / Nicholas Colletti6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCurtis Cavey / Bob Weickgenannt vs Philip Blum / Ray Stewart6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Eric Bass
published 4.5
4.17
Lee Wroe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.82
Gary Coiro
published 4
3.77
David Madsen
published 4
3.75
Curtis Cavey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Bob Weickgenannt
published 4
John Theis
published
Jonathan Wiggins
published
Patrick Orwig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Cavey + Bob Weickgenannt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Bass
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Lee Wroe
124W–82L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.17
4
Gary Coiro
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
David Madsen
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Curtis Cavey
76W–105L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bob Weickgenannt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
John Theis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Wiggins
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Orwig
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.