Teams

WI Combo 8.5M MALT Schure

2026 WI Combo · WI Combo 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-18vs WI Combo 8.5M MALT SandovalLost 12
W#1 DoublesJordan Raemisch / Grant Stafford vs Marius Dornhagen Schradermeier / Daichi Hikimoto6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Wachholz / Adam Koppenhaver vs Murphy Schaff / Jonathan Sandoval6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllen Schroeder / Brian Parkos vs Kyle Coplan / Michael Walsh2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-11vs WI Combo 8.5M MALT KosobuckiLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdam Koppenhaver / John Byerly vs Seth Taapken / Dan Felkner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJordan Raemisch / Sam Yurak vs Bob Whiteis / Ian Pray6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Parkos / Jeff Schure vs Alexander Strunce / Carlos Marquez4-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs WI Combo 8.5M MALT DundasLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrant Stafford / Jordan Raemisch vs Sasha Chackalackal / Alex Dundas6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Koppenhaver / John Byerly vs Matthew Bauman / Brayden Parman5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Schure / THIBAUT DEHAY vs William Herzog / Brian Quinlivan5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Jordan Raemisch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
THIBAUT DEHAY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Grant Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Brian Parkos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Sam Yurak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Adam Koppenhaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
John Byerly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Jeff Schure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Joseph Mercurio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Benjamin Wachholz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Allen Schroeder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
John Rice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Yurak + John Rice6164% games+4.9% vs expected
Brian Parkos + Jeff Schure7455% games+3.0% vs expected
Jordan Raemisch + Grant Stafford13556% games−1.9% vs expected
John Byerly + Jeff Schure3250% games−2.5% vs expected
John Byerly + Adam Koppenhaver3345% gamesnot enough data
Jordan Raemisch + Brian Parkos404 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Raemisch + Adam Koppenhaver404 matchesnot enough data
Allen Schroeder + Brian Parkos314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Raemisch
64W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
THIBAUT DEHAY
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Grant Stafford
36W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.17
4.5
Brian Parkos
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Sam Yurak
71W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.12
4.5
Adam Koppenhaver
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
John Byerly
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jeff Schure
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.92
Joseph Mercurio
78W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Benjamin Wachholz
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Allen Schroeder
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Rice
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.