Teams

Willow Oaks Franks

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-11vs Powhatan 3.0 Tennisbums - KelleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Kennedy / Jonathan Stalls vs Michael Gitomirski / Malik Mathews6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesIvan Mullinax vs Michael Martin3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTroy Kingsbury vs Malcolm Bickley3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-18vs ACAC Olson/CurtisWon 32
W#1 DoublesIvan Mullinax / Travis Hamilton vs Peter Olson / Doug Nunn6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlex Chudoba vs Matt Curtis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesColin Mott / Byron Chafin vs Thomas Tirrell / Gary Berg2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesPatrick McDuff vs Robert Peskind7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHank Heyming / Thomas Schaaf vs Bradford Rhodes / David Naputi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-04vs Hermitage - Smith WKENDWon 32
L#1 DoublesJim Kennedy / Travis Hamilton vs Turner Broughton / Christopher Forstner1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPrice Enroughty vs JR Pruden6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlex Chudoba / Ivan Mullinax vs Brian Betz / Gray Booker2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPatrick McDuff vs Robert Adams1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRaymond Cargill / Jim Gregory vs Ted Jurkuta / Blair Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Battery Park Frenzel 3.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesJonathan Stalls / Raymond Cargill vs Benton Boone / Dylan Holt1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIvan Mullinax vs Chris Gaines4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTroy Kingsbury / Colin Mott vs Randal Garrett / Nicholas Daniel6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChris Crowell vs Cody Frenzel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThomas Schaaf / Jim Gregory vs Jesse Stewart / Jacob Stanley6-0, 6-1
2025-04-12vs MAC Strings - NovakWon 41
L#1 DoublesJonathan Stalls / Raymond Cargill vs Todd Manning / Greg Chadwick2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIvan Mullinax vs Sydney Gonzales6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHank Heyming / Jim Gregory vs Ralph Novak / James Johnson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPatrick McDuff vs Patrick Urso6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesByron Chafin / Tyler Franks vs Morris White / Andrew Biddle6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJim Kennedy / Travis Hamilton vs Madhukumar Ramasamy / Elamaran Anbalagan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlex Chudoba vs Vinh Vo7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesColin Mott / Byron Chafin vs Jared Collier / Brian Newman6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPrice Enroughty vs Don Bruce6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRaymond Cargill / Hank Heyming vs Logan Kornhauser / Ramkumar Selvarathinam6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Price Enroughty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Alex Chudoba
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Ivan Mullinax
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.94
Troy Kingsbury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.94
Patrick McDuff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Jim Gregory
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Byron Chafin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Chris Crowell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Hank Heyming
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Jim Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Raymond Cargill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Travis Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Colin Mott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Jonathan Stalls
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Schaaf
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Tyler Franks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Kennedy + Travis Hamilton3252% games+2.1% vs expected
Jonathan Stalls + Jim Kennedy314 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Stalls + Raymond Cargill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Price Enroughty
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Alex Chudoba
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Ivan Mullinax
32W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Troy Kingsbury
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Patrick McDuff
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Jim Gregory
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Byron Chafin
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Chris Crowell
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Hank Heyming
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Jim Kennedy
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Raymond Cargill
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Travis Hamilton
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Colin Mott
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jonathan Stalls
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Thomas Schaaf
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Franks
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.