Teams

LTPodesta/Peninsula

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-02vs LABrandon/LNTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesGretchen Kohlhepp / Tracie Persinger vs Kimberly Drag / Marie Carpenter6-4, 6-1
2022-04-25vs LBMoore/JettonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGena Tracy / Karen Ray vs Barbara Moore / Jessica Wetherhold3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Beam / Brooke Hondros vs Dina White / Margaret Vermillion5-7, 3-6
2022-04-15vs LJArmstrong/NMPLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrooke Hondros vs Phebby Benton1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Ray / Liz Miller vs Ming Keadle / Claire Polk2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGretchen Kohlhepp / Tracie Persinger vs Morgan Hawk / Lauren Wilson4-6, 1-6
2022-04-11vs LLSchacher-Norcross/EdgemoorWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Ray / Debbie Beam vs Lisa Schacher / Keri Norcross6-2, 6-3
2022-03-21Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTracie Persinger vs Kimberly Lewis3-6, 0-6
2022-03-14vs LSClancy/EdgemoorLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Ray / Debbie Beam vs Barbara Kosior / Diane Pfeil2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-07vs LDUpchurch/CSDWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Beam / Karen Ray vs Jennifer Joiner / Paige Mcguirk6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Yin Chee Chin
published
3.91
Jane Ravey
published
3.56
Tracie Persinger
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Karen Ray
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Engel
published
Colleen Ludington
published 3.5
3.21
Brooke Hondros
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Gena Tracy
published 3.5
3.12
Tracy Podesta
published
Louise Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ray + Brooke Hondros5447% gamesnot enough data
Karen Ray + Tracie Persinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yin Chee Chin
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
Jane Ravey
24W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Gretchen Kohlhepp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Tracie Persinger
84W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Karen Ray
105W–158L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Engel
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Colleen Ludington
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brooke Hondros
95W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gena Tracy
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Tracy Podesta
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Louise Brown
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.