Teams

WC GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesPete Petrou / Brad Lewis vs Dustin Gonzales / Alec Wynne3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Doherty / Henry Sanin vs Sean Allen / Brandon Stovall6-7, 3-6
2023-08-29vs PRC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Moragne / Henry Sanin vs Pat Conroy / Eric Olsen-Dufour7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPete Petrou / Steve Pulver vs Taylor Beckstead / Jeff Skolnick7-6, 5-5
2023-08-22vs SS-H REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesHenry Sanin / Tim Wilson vs Jie Guo / Gary Rubida6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Doherty / Pete Petrou vs John Astle / John Holtz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-15vs HRCA-N YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Wilson / Michael Doherty vs Anthony Cataldo / John Dungey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPete Petrou / Brad Lewis vs Stephan Termaat / Michael Deminski7-6, 6-2
2023-08-08vs HW PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesHenry Sanin / Tim Wilson vs Matt Ball / John Miller6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Pulver / Pete Petrou vs Peter Albro / Cameron Ellsworth6-0, 6-2
2023-08-01vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Wilson / Michael Doherty vs Azim Khan / Edward Hynek0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStefan Paulsson / Henry Sanin vs Brandon Stovall / Dane Elliott6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-25vs PRC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Doherty / Henry Sanin vs John Wierzba / Sandy Wierzba6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Steve Pulver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Henry Sanin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Kevin Moragne
published
3.29
Michael Doherty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Brad Lewis
published 3.5
3.10
Pete Petrou
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Stefan Paulsson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Doherty + Henry Sanin17857% games+3.7% vs expected
Henry Sanin + Stefan Paulsson4256% games−0.1% vs expected
Henry Sanin + Steve Pulver2352% gamesnot enough data
Brad Lewis + Steve Pulver404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Pulver
49W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Henry Sanin
103W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kevin Moragne
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Michael Doherty
51W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brad Lewis
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Pete Petrou
71W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Stefan Paulsson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.