Teams

Spradling-West Point-OW

2025 Adult 55 & Over-EC · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-17vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Branton / Melanie Crain vs Missy Brown / Jennifer Falkner1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Hodges / Lucy Senter vs Angela McCoy / Cyndi Sullivan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Spradling / Lynn Moorehead vs Tracy Provenza / Renee Gibbons4-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBette Rhea / Catherine van Asselt vs Missy Brown / Leslie Webber4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Jennifer Falkner / Angela McCoy4-6, 1-6
2025-04-08vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Hodges / Claire Spradling vs Maria Bearden / Johnnie Hailey3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Jennifer Falkner / Cyndi Sullivan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelanie Crain / Dawn Branton vs Angela McCoy / Tracy Provenza5-7, 0-6
2025-03-27vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Hodges / Catherine van Asselt vs Missy Brown / Cyndi Sullivan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLucy Senter / Lynn Moorehead vs Jennifer Falkner / Renee Gibbons1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobbin Jones / Claire Spradling vs Kathryn Kenne / Rachelle Carter1-6, 4-6
2025-03-10vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLucy Senter / Pam Corban vs Maria Bearden / Ann Swedenburg2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Branton / Melanie Crain vs Missy Brown / Leslie Webber1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShelly Hollis / Cheryl Andrews vs Tracy Provenza / Angela McCoy1-6, 2-6
2025-03-06vs Webber Magnolia 55 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Hodges / Lynn Moorehead vs Renee Gibbons / Ann Swedenburg3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBette Rhea / Catherine van Asselt vs Johnnie Hailey / Maria Bearden2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Angela McCoy / Jennifer Falkner6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Webber Magnolia 55 3.5511536106
2Spradling-West Point-OW1531532210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bette Rhea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Catherine van Asselt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cheryl Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Claire Spradling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dawn Branton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Maggie Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lucy Senter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Moorehead
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie Crain
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Corban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robbin Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelly Hollis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bette Rhea + Catherine van Asselt224 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Crain + Dawn Branton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bette Rhea
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine van Asselt
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Andrews
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Claire Spradling
3W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dawn Branton
4W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Hamilton
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lucy Senter
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Moorehead
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Crain
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Corban
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robbin Jones
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Hollis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.