Teams

SLHHughes/Jetton 18+ 3.5 S

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Women 3.5 18+

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-05vs SLKNorcross/LNRC 18+ 3.5 WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKelly Stamey vs Jennifer Svienty7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBethany Barber vs Sara Baxter0-6, 2-6
2024-08-02vs SLABarnett-CSD S 18+ W 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesLaura Wansley vs Amy Barnett6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Carilli vs Mandy Tirabassi7-5, 6-3
2024-07-15vs SLKNorcross/LNRC 18+ 3.5 WLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlicia Bowman vs Keri Norcross1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-01vs SLABarnett-CSD S 18+ W 3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJulie Lyerly vs Savannah Barnett7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLaura Wansley vs Nell Wilson6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBethany Barber vs Sayra Brynn6-2, 6-2
2024-06-24vs SLKNorcross/LNRC 18+ 3.5 WLost 02
L#1 SinglesKelly Stamey vs Jennifer Svienty4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlicia Bowman vs Danielle Mikolajczyk3-6, 2-6
2024-06-10vs SLABarnett-CSD S 18+ W 3.5Split 11
L#1 SinglesLaura Wansley vs PALOMA LOPEZ1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Carilli vs Amy Barnett6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Jessica Carilli
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Kelly Stamey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Alicia Bowman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Laura Wansley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Bethany Barber
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Katie Philpott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Bowman + Kelly Stamey8553% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jessica Carilli
86W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Kelly Stamey
133W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Alicia Bowman
100W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Laura Wansley
37W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Bethany Barber
137W–117L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Katie Philpott
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.