Teams

Avalon-Wagner

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-08vs Burkwood 2.5 PowellWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Treharne / Jon Mullis vs Scott Childs / Charles Muncy2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEric Sutter vs Dylan Forlines7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael White / Chris Traylor vs Andrew Powell / Will Tumlin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-01vs HCC Lines WKENDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Jon Mullis vs Raj Sabharwal / Stanton McComb6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEdward Wagner / Andrew Treharne vs Christopher Ellis / Jr Joyce1-6, 2-6
2025-05-31vs Westwood WizWon 20
W#1 DoublesJon Mullis / Eric Sutter vs Joshua Alloway / Matthew Rose6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTrevor Merrion vs Ezra Harmon6-1, 6-3
2025-05-22vs ACAC BryanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJon Mullis / Chris Traylor vs Jeffrey Broderick / Nicholas Boukas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael White / Michael Wiebe vs Ralph Lee / Jesse Lemon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Deuce ex Machina (SCC) - PercySplit 11
W#1 DoublesEdward Wagner / Eric Sutter vs Ryan Nagle / Brian Foley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Treharne / Michael Wiebe vs Steve Quattlebaum / Barry Exley1-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs WO RobertsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Treharne / Eric Sutter vs John Cheatham / Michael Havranek6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChris Traylor / Jon Mullis vs Declan O'Connell / Kevin White3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Andrew Treharne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Jon Mullis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.11
Edward Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.11
Chris Traylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Eric Sutter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Michael Wiebe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trevor Merrion
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Mullis + Chris Traylor123 matchesnot enough data
Jon Mullis + Andrew Treharne123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Andrew Treharne
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Jon Mullis
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Edward Wagner
8W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Chris Traylor
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Eric Sutter
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Wiebe
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Merrion
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.