Teams

LTA-Q GOLD

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-03vs LAC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Burns / Samantha Kaczaral vs Joyce Kelly / Liana Kelly6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeah Powers vs Katie Melbourne6-0, 5-0
L#2 DoublesLindsey Cheney / Liz Downey vs Christina Cope / Adele Reester7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-27vs NJ REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Downey / Allegra Perry vs Crystal Campbell Messer / Terri Kimura0-1
W#1 SinglesLeah Powers vs Kristin Williams6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJodie Morgan / Amanda Burns vs Jennifer Bennett / Kathy Carver1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-20vs BRMST YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Cheney / Stephanie Mockler vs Jeanne Peoples / Kathy Schmidt4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLeah Powers vs Melissa Clarke7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAllegra Perry / Jodie Morgan vs Noelle Anthony / Laura Tedesco4-6, 2-6
2024-08-13vs BRMST BLACKLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Fedorka / Megan Wingfield vs Erin Kintzle / Julie Redlinger6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLiz Downey vs Courtney Chan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Cheney / Jodie Morgan vs Denise Belton / Olivia Belton2-6, 3-6
2024-08-06vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesMegan Wingfield / Lindsey Cheney vs Macy Bauerle / Emese Nagy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Burns / Stephanie Mockler vs Verhonica Hirst / Anna Thielen3-6, 1-6
2024-07-30vs LAC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Fedorka / Amanda Burns vs Joyce Kelly / Liana Kelly3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Powers vs Laura Nagel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllegra Perry / Liz Downey vs Robin Galloway / Oniki Ismaila3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-23vs NJ REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Fedorka / Megan Wingfield vs Crystal Campbell Messer / Barbara Everard2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mockler / Liz Downey vs Darcie Coy / Sheri Wright7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings43 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC YELLOW701838107
2RRTC PURPLE6118311144
3VC RED6115616157
4LEBTC BLACK6115617166
5CCV YELLOW6114719167
6RRTC YELLOW5216513132
7CACM SILVER5215615157
8KNO PURPLE5215616165
9MVCC YELLOW5214717161
10CCC BLUE5214718164
11NJ WHITE5214718176
12GR YELLOW5213819179
13BRMST SILVER5212919175
14PH PINK5213820187
15TTA PURPLE52111023160
16DTP ORANGE4314716149
17PRC PURPLE4312921198
18WC WHITE43111022172
19MVCC GOLD43111023169
20FOX GREEN43111024199
21CCC RED43101125187
22PCC RED43101126205
23WP-O YELLOW43101126192
24VCC PURPLE3371123180
25CPCC ORANGE34111022168
26CVTA PURPLE34101125196
27GPTC NAVY34101126200
28GCC NAVY3481327208
29CVTA YELLOW3491227200
30LPTC TEAL3491228216
31PRKR WHITE3491228194
32DTP BLUE3481329209
33CHCC GREEN3461532228
34RMTC NAVY2581329216
35EM PINK2571430219
36LTA-Q GOLD2581331210
37WP-G ORANGE2571433229
38SKY GOLD2551634230
39GR BLACK1671428189
40SS-LT PURPLE1651633229
41CR-BP YELLOW1631836224
42TTA SILVER0761532209
43RHCC YELLOW0751635232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Leah Powers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.85
Allegra Perry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Liz Downey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.62
Stephanie Mockler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Sara Fedorka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Lindsey Cheney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Tracey Graham
published
3.43
Amanda Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.15
Jodie Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Wingfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Kaczaral
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Kaczaral + Amanda Burns6064% games+10.5% vs expected
Liz Downey + Allegra Perry201155% games+0.8% vs expected
Tracey Graham + Sara Fedorka3742% games−2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Powers
35W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Allegra Perry
42W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Liz Downey
74W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Stephanie Mockler
24W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Sara Fedorka
37W–66L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
Lindsey Cheney
41W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Tracey Graham
20W–27L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Amanda Burns
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Jodie Morgan
61W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Megan Wingfield
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Samantha Kaczaral
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.