Teams

Marsden - SHL

2025 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-02vs Prindiville - PCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSissy Ford / Adriana Segura Graef vs Valerie Wilson / Trish Kington6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Keigley / Melissa Caster vs Susan Rice / Amy R Falzone4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Crane / Dana Persons vs Denise Prindiville / Susan Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Prindiville - PCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSissy Ford / Adriana Segura Graef vs Kathy Ross / Sandra Wilson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Marsden / Dana Persons vs Thuy Nguyen / Trish Kington6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Etscheid / Barbie Doherty vs Susan Rice / Libby Covington7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs Patterson - RS ClayLost 12
W#1 DoublesDana Persons / Melissa Caster vs Jeannette Fabbro / Allison McCrory6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid vs Sue Nast / Tonya Chase7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Crane / Liz Edlund vs Karen Penn / Leigh Diamond2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Dana Persons
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ashley Keigley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kim Gall
published
3.00
Karen Crane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Sissy Ford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Liz Edlund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Barbie Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Melissa Caster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Teresa Kirk
published
2.80
Christine Re
published 3
2.67
Kimberly Etscheid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Adriana Segura Graef
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Marsden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Etscheid + Sissy Ford2642% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Persons
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Keigley
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kim Gall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Karen Crane
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Sissy Ford
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Liz Edlund
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3.5
Barbie Doherty
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Melissa Caster
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Teresa Kirk
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Christine Re
35W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Kimberly Etscheid
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Adriana Segura Graef
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Marsden
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.