Teams

TeamForman

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
3.50
Nathalia Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.50
Emily Albanese
published
3.35
Alejandra Taylor
published 3.5
3.30
Adriana Monsalve
usually #2 Singles 89%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.25
Claudia Donnelly
published 3.5
3.23
Geraldine Blakely
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.14
Ellen Fine
published
3.12
Veronica Estrada
published
3.08
Lisette Trimble
published
3.04
EVA del REY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Julia Sturm
published
2.96
Cecilia Aguirre
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.91
Emilia Osorio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Maria Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Lizette Cabeza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Mariah Mozzali
published 3
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Monsalve + Geraldine Blakely5172% games+16.3% vs expected
Geraldine Blakely + Ellen Fine7268% games+10.1% vs expected
Lisette Trimble + Ellen Fine7256% games+8.8% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Emily Albanese351161% games+3.3% vs expected
Emilia Osorio + EVA del REY5157% gamesnot enough data
Nathalia Blanco + Adriana Monsalve5058% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Aguirre + Lizette Cabeza404 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Donnelly + EVA del REY224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caterina Castello
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Emily Albanese
30W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Alejandra Taylor
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Adriana Monsalve
181W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Claudia Donnelly
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Geraldine Blakely
134W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Ellen Fine
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Veronica Estrada
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Lisette Trimble
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
EVA del REY
43W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Julia Sturm
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Cecilia Aguirre
116W–62L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Emilia Osorio
43W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Maria Sierra
94W–120L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Lizette Cabeza
35W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Mariah Mozzali
12W–35L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.