Teams

Trice as Nice

2026 TRI-Level · Women's- 4.5,4.0,3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · Women's- 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Triple Threat000000
2Lung Busters000000
3Duece-a-drama000000
4Hall of Framers000000
5Shanks-A-Lot000000
6Zero Love Given000000
7Trice as Nice000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tamra Williamson
published
3.80
Gena Luecke
published
Andrea Murphy
published 4
3.73
Kathy Kang
published
3.59
Ann Wagner
published 4
3.28
Lisa Gee-Gray
published
3.25
Caryn Barman
published 3.5
3.22
Lynne Tomasa
published
3.16
Shannon Bohan
published
3.07
Ryanne Strohm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamra Williamson + Kathy Kang81147% games+1.1% vs expected
Andrea Murphy + Tamra Williamson422454% games+0.7% vs expected
Lisa Gee-Gray + Caryn Barman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamra Williamson
113W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
Gena Luecke
137W–78L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Andrea Murphy
76W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Kang
90W–59L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ann Wagner
65W–104L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Lisa Gee-Gray
44W–69L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caryn Barman
83W–132L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Lynne Tomasa
22W–42L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Shannon Bohan
80W–96L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Ryanne Strohm
32W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Maria Patricia Bernabe
9W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.