Teams

LTFC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs VCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Gonzales / Dori Yaworski vs Dana Henry / Kirklyn Simonton2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLori Bowling / Beth Zubowicz vs Courtney Ring / Barbara Weisberg3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrandi Renick-Smith / Tracy Bourque vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-11vs PRC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Gonzales / Dori Yaworski vs Shawn Blackwood / Stephanie Gresh1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTracy Bourque vs Meghan Bennett2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKrista Vickery / Lori Bowling vs Hilary Marano / Lara Callas3-6, 0-6
2023-07-04vs PCRK REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNancy Brooks / Tracy Bourque vs Karmen Davis / Christine Aberle2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrandi Renick-Smith / Krista Vickery vs Jody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-27vs PCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Krista Vickery vs Janet Perry / Stacey Hayward6-3, 3-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Brooks / Brandi Renick-Smith vs Lisa Hossack / Lynsey Adragna0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Bowling / Tracy Bourque vs Julie Eisenrich / Sarah Fitzpatrick6-1, 6-2
2023-06-20vs CPV BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDori Yaworski / Ashley Agrelius vs Traci Heffron / Britney Anderson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Bowling / Krista Vickery vs Yvette Watson / Katie Abner6-3, 6-4
2023-06-13vs CACI GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshley Gonzales / Ashley Agrelius vs Stacey Anderson / Jodi Little3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Bowling / Brandi Renick-Smith vs Somsi Stringer / Angela Rose0-6, 0-6
2023-06-06vs WC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesDori Yaworski / Ashley Gonzales vs Jamelle Leyden / Stacy Burd1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Venita Vereen vs Melissa Klein / Margie Strande4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Bourque / Krista Vickery vs Doreen Rogers / Dawn Bergin6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Venita Vereen
published
3.80
Ashley Gonzales
published 4
3.76
Krista Vickery
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Dori Yaworski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brandi Renick-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Nancy Brooks
published
3.52
Lori Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Beth Zubowicz
published 4
3.50
Tracy Bourque
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Heidi Elliott
published
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Paula Hruska
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Yaworski + Ashley Gonzales12753% games+2.9% vs expected
Krista Vickery + Lori Bowling4545% games+1.0% vs expected
Nancy Brooks + Tracy Bourque21338% games−5.0% vs expected
Krista Vickery + Ashley Agrelius111249% games−6.3% vs expected
Ashley Agrelius + Brandi Renick-Smith3542% games−7.4% vs expected
Dori Yaworski + Tracy Bourque1436% games−17.8% vs expected
Tracy Bourque + Brandi Renick-Smith7257% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Agrelius + Dori Yaworski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venita Vereen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Ashley Gonzales
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Krista Vickery
67W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Dori Yaworski
72W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Brandi Renick-Smith
52W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
Nancy Brooks
13W–34L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Lori Bowling
104W–111L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Beth Zubowicz
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Tracy Bourque
85W–126L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Heidi Elliott
16W–31L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Paula Hruska
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.