Teams

KF.Collins

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-25vs TOC.YangLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobyn Merck / Rachel Garcia vs Leigh Barter / Skylar Poole3-6, 3-6
2022-09-21Split 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Moran / Ryleigh Burns vs Maria Hernandez / Abigail Holden3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Marisa Terruso vs Amy Condon / Britney Rider6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-15vs PW.KraftSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarol Collins / Christina Scagnelli vs Heather Hastings / Jenn George0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobyn Merck / Rachel Garcia vs Penny Kraft / Hollis Mertens7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-28Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRyleigh Burns / Christina Scagnelli vs Button Hall / Alicia Fitzsimmons3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Martin / Robyn Merck vs Lori Jensen / Tamara Faulkner1-6, 2-6
2022-08-20vs TOC.PerroneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyleigh Burns / Melanie Taylor vs Kelly Townsend / Bladen Leippe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Scagnelli / Sarah Martin vs Julie Brigham / Heather Roberts0-6, 2-6
2022-08-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobyn Merck / Lauren Moran vs Maggie Love / Amber Bruner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-07vs MD.McCauleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyleigh Burns / Melanie Taylor vs Paige Jennings / Stephanie Wright6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Garcia / Robyn Merck vs Hillary Parnell / Dabney Sninski1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ryleigh Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Marisa Terruso
published
3.03
Christina Scagnelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Hellrung
published
2.83
Robyn Merck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Carol Collins
published 3
2.12
Debra Reuther
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Merck + Christina Scagnelli4160% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Merck + Carol Collins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ryleigh Burns
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Marisa Terruso
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Christina Scagnelli
110W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jennifer Hellrung
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Robyn Merck
91W–131L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Carol Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
2.5
Debra Reuther
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.