Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Lober

2025 SCTA SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-20vs CV-The Springs/Eileen MartinWon 10
W#3 DoublesRuth Adler / Laurie Lober vs Maurene Cronyn / Samantha Samulis6-3, 6-4
2025-12-14vs CV-The Springs/Eileen MartinWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaurie Lober / Ruth Adler vs Carol Mallabone / Catherine Bonneau6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-12-13vs CV-The Springs/Eileen MartinLost 01
L#3 DoublesRuth Adler / Mary Esper vs Carol Mallabone / Eileen Martin0-6, 2-6
2025-12-06vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNancy Pacharzina / Jean MacHiz vs Margaret Middleton / Susan Waugh6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRuth Adler / Mary Esper vs Jeanette Petersen / Kathie Miller2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-01vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriLost 01
L#3 DoublesJean MacHiz / Verna Watson vs Kelley Johnson / Kathie Miller5-7, 3-6
2025-10-25vs CV LLW Indian Wells TG/B HesterLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Klauer / Jean MacHiz vs Lainie Dickson / Julee Moore0-6, 0-6
2025-10-18vs CV LLW Indian Wells TG/B HesterWon 10
W#3 DoublesJean MacHiz / Julie Klauer vs Isabella George / Jessica Hawkins6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Sherry Bisaillon
published
3.04
Ruth Adler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Nancy Pacharzina
published
2.71
Ann Robinow
published 3
2.58
Julie Klauer
published
2.54
Jean MacHiz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Mary Esper
published
2.43
Laurie Lober
published
Erica Carpenter
published
Pamela Biddle
published
Verna Watson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Biddle + Sherry Bisaillon3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Bisaillon
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
Ruth Adler
70W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Nancy Pacharzina
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.92
3
Ann Robinow
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Julie Klauer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Jean MacHiz
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Mary Esper
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Laurie Lober
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Francesca Hitselberger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Biddle
47W–49L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Verna Watson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.