Teams

Summer Sets

MTTL - Women's · 3.0 Division

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-20vs Bowers/OxfordWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Talbert / Lauren Carlson vs Rachel Stevenson / Margaret Sheena de Giorgio6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Kirkland / Joy Harris vs Katherine Kirkland / Kitty Boyte McKee7-5, 6-0
2026-08-06vs Hitmakers 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Cate / Darci Kimmerling vs Raquel Babb / Constance Michelle Nixon4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Kirkland / Beth Stromatt vs Ann Kehayes / Susan Taylor2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Krumm / Kayla Brugnoli vs Amy Spiehler / Mimi Grant1-6, 0-6
2026-07-23vs BondsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Grippo / Carey Burch vs Gillian Stewart / Christy Carter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Harris / Beth Stromatt vs Leslie Atchley / Jennifer Bonds1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMARY DALE CROZIER / Ashley Kirkland vs Cara Ferguson / Mary Smith1-6, 4-6
2026-07-16vs Andrews/Johnson/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoy Harris / Darci Kimmerling vs Kathryn Aupperlee / Gracie Moakler2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJill Talbert / Catherine Cate vs Brandy Johnson / Sarah Mcgee6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Hall / Ashley Kirkland vs Louisa Bateman / Rachel Chisolm6-4, 6-4
2026-07-09vs Hillwood CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Grippo / Joy Harris vs Mary Alden Brett / Laura Woodard1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Obremskey / Beth Stromatt vs Lauren Trent / Emerson Scales1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Kirkland / Hayley Robinson vs Stephanie Hartley / Sheila Larson1-6, 0-6
2026-06-25vs OsborneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Talbert / Patricia Hall vs Melissa Carla Grillo / Becky Fluke4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDarci Kimmerling / Jill Obremskey vs Mitsuyo Suzuki / Emily Eggebrecht5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Krumm / Catherine Cate vs Jess Lee / Kristy Reuter2-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs Summer SlammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarci Kimmerling / Lauren Carlson vs Heather Bomar / Erin Hunter5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Stromatt / Carey Burch vs Lindsay LeBreton / Magen Hooper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Obremskey / Kayla Brugnoli vs Kristina Massey / Kristin Pratt0-6, 5-7
2026-06-11vs Thoma RichlandLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarey Burch / Alison Grippo vs Kim Thoma / Courtney Irving2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Harris / Hayley Robinson vs Marianne Huddle / Colleen Bracken5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Krumm / Catherine Cate vs Nobu Junge / Hays Estes2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0 Division
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bonds071925120
2Thoma Richland0712923182
3Osborne07101124179
4Hitmakers 3.00791224195
5Summer Slammers0771429205
6Andrews/Johnson/Nashville0761531202
7Bowers/Oxford0761532219
8Summer Sets0751635234
9Hillwood CC082227116

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Lauren Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jill Talbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Joy Harris
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Jill Obremskey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Catherine Cate
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
Darci Kimmerling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Alison Grippo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Hayley Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Carey Burch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
MARY DALE CROZIER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Beth Stromatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Ashley Kirkland
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.31
Cathy Krumm
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Kayla Brugnoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Carlson
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Jill Talbert
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Joy Harris
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Jill Obremskey
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Catherine Cate
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Darci Kimmerling
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Alison Grippo
2W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Hayley Robinson
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Carey Burch
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
MARY DALE CROZIER
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Beth Stromatt
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Ashley Kirkland
2W–12L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Cathy Krumm
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.31
Kayla Brugnoli
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.