Teams

RPM

2023 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-19vs Game ChangersLost 01
L#1 DoublesZhuo Yang / Boming Zhang vs Jin Soh / Paul Song4-6, 4-6
2023-11-11vs Blazing AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Choi / Boming Zhang vs Dan Rosenberg / Bryan Bassig6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMofei Chen / Zeyang Shen vs Bill Hartman / Kyle Spinks6-4, 6-2
2023-11-02vs Game ChangersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Choi / Boming Zhang vs David Kim / Chan Young Jung6-3, 6-2
2023-10-28vs Blazing AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMofei Chen / Zeyang Shen vs Maximillian Lewis / Rudolph Isaac6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-10-14vs Game ChangersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMofei Chen / Zhuo Yang vs Jaeil Ahn / Paul Song6-3, 6-1
2023-10-10vs Blazing AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesXiao Liu / Boming Zhang vs Orlando Delgado / Victor Sanchez4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMofei Chen / Bo Gao vs Dan Rosenberg / Bryan Bassig3-6, 1-6
2023-10-07vs DefendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMofei Chen / Louis Fung vs Surendra Babu / Richard McKeon6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Bo Gao
published 4
3.53
Peter Zhu
published
3.50
Louis Fung
published
3.38
Jun Hee Kim
published
3.37
Mofei Chen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Zhuo Yang
published
3.23
Xiao Liu
published
3.15
Mark Tyler
published
3.03
Boming Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Bo Liang
published 3
2.80
Hyun Soo Kim
published
2.78
Eddie Gao
published
Zeyang Shen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Gao + Bo Liang224 matchesnot enough data
Louis Fung + Mark Tyler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bo Gao
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Louis Fung
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jun Hee Kim
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Mofei Chen
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Zhuo Yang
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Xiao Liu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Boming Zhang
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Hyun Soo Kim
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Eddie Gao
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Zeyang Shen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.