Teams

Smash Queens

2025 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-01vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesBree Sundling / Kathryn Carberry vs Coree Carver / Stephanie Melink4-6, 2-6
2025-06-26vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesYutong Luo / Rhonda Deininger vs Stephanie Melink / Ruby Pulver4-6, 1-6
2025-06-19vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Jasek / Kathryn Carberry vs Coree Carver / Jackie Whitesell3-6, 4-6
2025-06-17vs Slice GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Carberry / Colleen Trese vs Martine Castoro / Elizabeth Schneider6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLiz Jasek vs Allison Knight0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYutong Luo / ANDREA STUART vs Angela Little / Stephanie Melink6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Slice GirlsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBree Sundling / ANDREA STUART vs Diana Linderman / Martine Castoro5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Jones / Liz Jasek vs Coree Carver / Nancy Napier6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-05vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Jones / Liz Jasek vs Coree Carver / Elizabeth Schneider0-6, 0-6
2025-05-29vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhonda Deininger / Liz Jasek vs Diana Linderman / Ruby Pulver3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Slice Girls7016512140
2Smash Queens0751634218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Colleen Trese
published 3
Bree Sundling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Sara Brown
published 2.5
2.21
ANDREA STUART
published 2.5
Kathryn Carberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Liz Jasek
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rhonda Deininger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yutong Luo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Colleen Trese
68W–121L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
2.5
Bree Sundling
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Sara Brown
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
ANDREA STUART
27W–21L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Kathryn Carberry
4W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liz Jasek
2W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Deininger
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yutong Luo
8W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.