Teams

MTS: Stiles

2026 NH Tri Level-Summer · Women 3.0 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs YMCA:QueensOfTheCourt:AlpucheLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Stiles / Alicia Zanderigo vs Karen Craver / Janet Riese Spain2-6, 0-6
2026-08-04vs YMCA:Rogers:SettinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlicia Zanderigo / Laurie Stadler vs Abigail Rogers / Rebecca Foxon0-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs GH:Cahill:AlperinWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Stadler / Heather Stiles vs Krista Alperin / Jill Lieberman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-21vs YMCA:QueensOfTheCourt:AlpucheLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Stiles / Laurie Stadler vs Paige Alpuche / Kristin Gorrie0-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs YMCA:Rogers:SettinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Stiles / Alicia Zanderigo vs Abigail Rogers / Myia Frechette1-6, 5-7
2026-07-07vs GH:Cahill:AlperinLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Stiles / Laurie Stadler vs Katherine McCandless / Krista Alperin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.0 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YMCA:QueensOfTheCourt:Alpuche0541228
2MTS: Stiles0514954
3YMCA:Rogers:Settino0651234
4GH:Cahill:Alperin06151171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Alicia Zanderigo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Marion Reid
published
2.58
Heather Stiles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Laurie Stadler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Stiles + Alicia Zanderigo4744% games−3.0% vs expected
Heather Stiles + Marion Reid2346% games−4.0% vs expected
Heather Stiles + Laurie Stadler1537% games−9.3% vs expected
Laurie Stadler + Alicia Zanderigo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alicia Zanderigo
19W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Marion Reid
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Heather Stiles
51W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laurie Stadler
34W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.