Teams

SH - Garrett Fall 18 3.0

2025 Fall 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.0 Adult 18 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-26vs Reeves 18 3.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesDebbie Peak / Cecelia Gautney vs Amy Reeves / Nina McNatt6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDebbie Haythorn vs Laken Gilliland6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Garrett / Tanya Baugh vs Rita Fisher / Amanda Davis6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCherie Webster / Mary Helen Bachofer vs Veronica Stancil / Rhonda Pounders6-2, 6-2
2024-11-05vs Reeves 18 3.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesMary Helen Bachofer / Rebecca Hall vs Rita Fisher / Olivia Gann7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCamryn Behel vs Amy Reeves7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Garrett / Cecelia Gautney vs Cindy Walker / Laken Gilliland6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Winkle / Tanya Baugh vs Jodi Page / Rhonda Pounders6-2, 6-1
2024-10-19vs Reeves 18 3.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesMary Helen Bachofer / Lisa Newbern vs Jill Archer / Cindy Walker6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCamryn Behel vs Laken Gilliland7-6, 1-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Baron / Cecelia Gautney vs Rita Fisher / Veronica Stancil6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Kelley / Cherie Webster vs Nina McNatt / Rhonda Pounders6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Valerie Oakley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Cecelia Gautney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Carol Baron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Debbie Haythorn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Camryn Behel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Debbie Peak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Angela Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Tanya Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Nancy Winkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Cherie Webster
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Lisa Newbern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Helen Bachofer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Kelley + Cherie Webster4255% games+9.2% vs expected
Valerie Oakley + Debbie Haythorn4948% games−0.6% vs expected
Debbie Peak + Carol Baron134 matchesnot enough data
Cecelia Gautney + Cherie Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Haythorn + Carol Baron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie Oakley
38W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Cecelia Gautney
34W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Carol Baron
35W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3.5
Debbie Haythorn
43W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Camryn Behel
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Peak
42W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Angela Kelley
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
Tanya Baugh
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Nancy Winkle
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Cherie Webster
15W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Lisa Newbern
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Helen Bachofer
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.