Teams

ROLLING HILLS 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Trevor Scotto
published
3.79
Laura Hoppe
published
3.52
Patrick Rimbaud
published
3.50
Ara Hamamjian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Peter Halpern
published
3.46
Jeri Obert
published
3.44
Marilyn Papa
published
3.43
Yasha Rahimzadeh
published
3.42
Christopher Hatch
published 3.5
3.39
Mike Schnebeck
published
3.31
Ben Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.31
Lucie Powers
published
3.31
Mark Latimer
published
3.29
Alaina Thompson
published 3.5
3.28
Care Pittman
published 3.5
3.28
Noah Dehlinger
published
3.24
Thalia Milano
published
3.20
Jonell Langley
published
3.19
Curtis Crawford
published 3.5
3.19
Rebecca Peel
published
3.17
Kristine Banton
published
3.15
Steven Lund
published
Sarah Gouveia
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevor Scotto
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Laura Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
Patrick Rimbaud
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Ara Hamamjian
57W–80L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Peter Halpern
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Jeri Obert
24W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Marilyn Papa
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Yasha Rahimzadeh
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Christopher Hatch
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Mike Schnebeck
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ben Nelson
27W–40L career · 23 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Lucie Powers
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Mark Latimer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Alaina Thompson
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Care Pittman
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Noah Dehlinger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Thalia Milano
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jonell Langley
9W–26L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Curtis Crawford
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Rebecca Peel
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Kristine Banton
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Steven Lund
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Anne Marie McCormick
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Gouveia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.