Teams

BP RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.39 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-01vs CP BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Rhoad / Talia Cioth vs Irene Mendelsberg / Lauren Perry1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Nelson / Tricia Yeo vs Claire Ehrlich / Heather Reimann7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Reeb vs Kimberly Gillock4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Morgan Cox vs Stephanie Campbell / Megan Davis3-6, 2-6
2024-05-28vs RHCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMeg Staebell / Andrea Philleo vs Anne Torkelson / Ajyra JONES5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Jordan Pullman7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Tricia Yeo vs Martha Williams / Marie Nguyen6-1, 6-3
2024-05-14vs CACM GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Meg Staebell vs Tonya Laden / Catherine Safieddine4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Carlie Odau5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Nelson / Tricia Yeo vs Melissa Doidge / Rachel Heise6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-07vs APR-U GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Mary Nelson vs Jenny Loeff / Irina Suyumova3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Meg Staebell vs Stephanie Finnigan / Juana Donald6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-30vs WP GREENLost 03
L#2 DoublesMary Nelson / Tricia Yeo vs Gretchen Wilder / Diem Phan-Boyer0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Reeb vs Elise Engleberg - (DQ)*0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeg Staebell / Yukiko Brooks vs Cydney Springer / Sydnee Yap6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-23vs RHCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Talia Cioth vs Shellie Hall / Jenna Marvin7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Meg Staebell vs Anne Torkelson / Marie Nguyen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Reeb / Rosemary Garcia vs Karen Greenwood / Lora Quirk3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-16vs CP BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Talia Cioth vs Heather Reimann / Claire Ehrlich6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIrene Arguelles / Yukiko Brooks vs Irene Mendelsberg / Lauren Perry1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Talia Cioth
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.25
Charlotte Rhoad
published 4.5
4.18
Meg Staebell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Denise Hernandez
published 4.5
4.08
Rosemary Garcia
published
4.08
Andrea Philleo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.05
Christi Valicenti
published 4.5
4.01
Tricia Yeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.98
Michelle Reeb
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Mary Nelson
published
3.60
Morgan Cox
published
Irene Arguelles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks3846% games−1.4% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Talia Cioth4644% games−5.7% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Meg Staebell2442% games−6.1% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Irene Arguelles3745% games−8.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−16.1% vs expected
Tricia Yeo + Mary Nelson404 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Philleo + Irene Arguelles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Talia Cioth
74W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Meg Staebell
71W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Denise Hernandez
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Rosemary Garcia
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christi Valicenti
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Tricia Yeo
52W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4.5
Michelle Reeb
39W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mary Nelson
29W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Morgan Cox
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Irene Arguelles
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.