Teams

CCTA55/Rose/Colleton

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Adult Women - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Gail Denton
published 4
3.61
Ginny Lawro
published 4
3.59
Sheryl Thomas
published
3.54
Julia Burnett
published
3.48
Linda Rose
published
3.46
Lynn Helgeson
published
3.45
Gary Sabbatino
published 3.5
3.37
Susie McLaughlin
published
Jean Freeman
published
Marty Arnett
published
Nancy Grossman
published
Pamela Thomas Dyer
published
Patricia MacKay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Thomas Dyer + Gary Sabbatino2348% gamesnot enough data
Susie McLaughlin + Gary Sabbatino404 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Lawro + Linda Rose134 matchesnot enough data
Sheryl Thomas + Gary Sabbatino314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Grossman + Patricia MacKay213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Grossman + Gail Denton123 matchesnot enough data
Marty Arnett + Susie McLaughlin213 matchesnot enough data
Marty Arnett + Jean Freeman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gail Denton
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Ginny Lawro
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Sheryl Thomas
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Julia Burnett
12W–28L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Linda Rose
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Lynn Helgeson
25W–47L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Gary Sabbatino
33W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Susie McLaughlin
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jean Freeman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marty Arnett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Grossman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Thomas Dyer
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia MacKay
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.