Teams

Speaks - Genesis, Topeka

2022 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs White/Munds - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Tripp / Karen Speaks vs Wendy Carter / Kim Dinkel6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Hutton vs Brenda Munds4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Gleason / Laura Leinwetter vs DeAnn White / Kathleen Bagwell6-1, 7-6
2022-03-20vs White/Munds - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 30
W#1 DoublesDestiny MacE / Elizabeth Herman vs Kathleen Bagwell / Brenda Munds6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJennifer Lane vs Bo Davidson6-1, 1-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Tripp / Jodi Gee vs DeAnn White / Cathy Suellentrop3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKaren Speaks / Ali Wilson vs Anne Burris / Maggie Seitz3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJodi Gee vs Olivia Cartwright6-7, 2-5
W#2 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Debbie Flynn vs Shelly Hardman / Lea Ann Mcilvain6-0, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCathy Rinehart / Debbie Flynn vs Karen Jargo / Diane Ball6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Lea Ann Mcilvain6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Speaks / Jodi Gee vs Lisa Cole / Shelly Hardman0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDebbie Flynn / Elizabeth Herman vs Jaclyn Reilly / Courtney Darrah3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lane / Cathy Rinehart vs Whitney Ward / Allyson Teal6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAllison Tripp / Ali Wilson vs Whitney Ward / Allyson Teal3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lane / Destiny MacE vs Jaclyn Reilly / Courtney Darrah6-2, 6-0
2022-01-30vs KS/Angell/18 &Over3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Gleason / Debra Schwarz vs Pam Geihsler / Reagan Geihsler4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAli Wilson vs Dana Huffaker6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKarli Alderson / Laura Leinwetter vs Samantha Angell / Stephanie Beatty6-7, 4-6
2022-01-30vs KS/Angell/18 &Over3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Gleason / Debra Schwarz vs Samantha Angell / Shirlene Shepard2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDestiny MacE vs Pam Geihsler1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKarli Alderson / Jennifer Lane vs Stephanie Beatty / Reagan Geihsler6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Angell/18 &Over3.5W6216819194
2Speaks - Genesis, Topeka5317719184
3Jargo/Ball - Crestview Country Club35111328211
4Reilly - Wichita Country Club, Wichita0822244266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Destiny MacE
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Karen Speaks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Ali Wilson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Elizabeth Herman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Debbie Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allison Tripp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debra Schwarz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Angie Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Cathy Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jennifer Lane
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jodi Gee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Karli Alderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Leinwetter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Hutton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Destiny MacE + Karen Speaks3259% games+15.5% vs expected
Debra Schwarz + Karen Speaks13068% games+7.8% vs expected
Cathy Rinehart + Debbie Flynn6264% games+3.9% vs expected
Karen Speaks + Allison Tripp2450% games−0.6% vs expected
Destiny MacE + Jennifer Lane16954% games−1.0% vs expected
Laura Leinwetter + Angie Gleason6255% games−2.2% vs expected
Debra Schwarz + Cathy Rinehart3548% games−6.4% vs expected
Debra Schwarz + Debbie Flynn2451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Destiny MacE
89W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Karen Speaks
134W–94L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Ali Wilson
138W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Elizabeth Herman
37W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Flynn
45W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Allison Tripp
50W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Debra Schwarz
40W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Angie Gleason
54W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cathy Rinehart
111W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Lane
46W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Gee
14W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karli Alderson
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Leinwetter
53W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Hutton
33W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.