Teams

El.Hodges18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-13Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHartley Watts / MaryBeth Jackson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-06vs Al.Stubbs18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMacY Fisher / Leslie Boesch vs Kelly Moler Glass / Neal Goodwin6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Nena Marks / Ramona Holdstock7-5, 7-6
2024-09-23vs Al.Stubbs18CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Jackson / Jennifer McEntee vs HEATHER WATERS / Anne Frautschi4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIvette Duran / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Kathie Stronach / Karen Rothschild6-4, 6-2
2024-09-22vs Vi.Jenkins18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Heather Remley vs Jessica Baker / Colleen Brown6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIvette Duran / Leslie Boesch vs Taylor Casey / Virginia Jenkins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHartley Watts / Jamie Breunig vs Elizabeth Speicher / Hallie Shinn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-01vs Vi.Jenkins18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesIvette Duran / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Elizabeth Speicher / Erin Piechocinski6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-25vs Al.Stubbs18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hiller / Heather Remley vs Nena Marks / Paula Fernandez-Pita1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTanita Tedamrongwanish / Hartley Watts vs HEATHER WATERS / Anne Frautschi3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMaryBeth Jackson / Leslie Boesch vs Emily Perry / Jennifer Reese2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-11vs Vi.Jenkins18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesJamie Breunig / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Taylor Casey / Elizabeth Speicher5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Angelina Neiberger vs Tiffany Holbrook / Erin Piechocinski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Boesch / MacY Fisher vs Colleen Brown / Virginia Jenkins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.52 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.80
Elizabeth Hodges
published
4.67
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.60
Jamie Breunig
published
4.54
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.51
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.51
Ivette Duran
published
4.46
Leslie Boesch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.42
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.37
Angelina Neiberger
published 4.5
4.30
Hartley Watts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
MacY Fisher
published
Hannah Dahlem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Remley + Tanita Tedamrongwanish10653% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% gamesnot enough data
MaryBeth Jackson + Tanita Tedamrongwanish4257% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + MaryBeth Jackson3256% gamesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Hartley Watts314 matchesnot enough data
MaryBeth Jackson + Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Jennifer Hiller123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hiller + Elizabeth Hodges213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.93
Elizabeth Hodges
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
178W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
62W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.54
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
107W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.51
Ivette Duran
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Leslie Boesch
243W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
Mary-Katherine Martin
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.42
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 8 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Angelina Neiberger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Hartley Watts
55W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
MacY Fisher
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.26
Hannah Dahlem
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.