Teams

Willow Fork - Alley Cats

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJolena Tu / Heather Liskow vs Tania Perez / Terra Johnson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeatriz Kizer / Lisa Mccarty vs Bianca Mcbride / Maria Perezhogina6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesJanet Wynne / Cindy Conley vs Anjanette Bibles / Monica Stasse6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-17vs Katy Park - AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartha Ruiz / Marcie Naughton vs Vibeke Ryan / Pam Pierce6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerri Jacobs / Jolena Tu vs LIZZA ALVAREZ / Stephanie Wall6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatherine Rowe / Heather Liskow vs Nadia Simmons / Maria del Pilar Sanchez6-2, 6-0
2026-03-03vs Katy Park - Court DivasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSharon Cahill / Martha Ruiz vs Ailian Hu / Na Zhang6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Shropshire / Heather Liskow vs Lanyun Han / Ling Ling1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Wynne / Alissa Vorous vs Ning Chen / Xiaoshuo Wu6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJolena Tu / Leslie Taylor vs Annie Zhao / Qi Shen6-4, 6-3
2026-02-24vs New Territory - Passing ShotsLost 13
W#1 DoublesMartha Ruiz / Marcie Naughton vs Carrie Lust / Stacy Hanson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Liskow / Beatriz Kizer vs Joni Scheller / Twyla Scott1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Katherine Rowe vs Janet Beaver / Nicole Kitagawa3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAlissa Vorous / Lisa Mccarty vs Connie Esposito / Gail Haisten3-6, 3-6
2026-02-12vs Katy Park - Court DivasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcie Naughton / Martha Ruiz vs Xia Li / Yue Zhang0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJolena Tu / Andrea Shropshire vs Cuixia Song / Lanyun Han6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeather Liskow / Danielle Pierce vs Wei Phillips / Xiaoshuo Wu1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesHeather Liskow / Jerri Jacobs vs Rebecca Newton / Laura Winkler2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeatriz Kizer / Martha Ruiz vs Bonnie Day / Evelin Wirtmann6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJolena Tu / Andrea Shropshire vs Anjanette Bibles / Maria Perezhogina6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesDanielle Pierce / Janet Wynne vs Mayra Moraes / Sarah Shackley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Katy Park - AcesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCindy Conley / Andrea Shropshire vs Tracy Rolling / Vibeke Ryan1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Sharon Cahill vs Stephanie Wall / LIZZA ALVAREZ3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBeatriz Kizer / Danielle Pierce vs Samantha Babin / Pam Pierce5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesKatherine Rowe / Heather Liskow vs Nadia Simmons / Yumi Rawlinson6-2, 6-3
2026-01-20vs New Territory - Passing ShotsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarcie Naughton / Heather Liskow vs Carrie Lust / Ying Wang2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeatriz Kizer / Martha Ruiz vs Joni Scheller / Neha Parikh2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Shropshire / Jolena Tu vs Janet Beaver / Stacy Hanson3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesCyndi Herold / Janet Wynne vs Connie Esposito / Mary Ann Asnaashari6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Martha Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Marcie Naughton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Allen
published 3.5
3.25
Jolena Tu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Katherine Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Heather Liskow
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Lisa Mccarty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Andrea Shropshire
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.16
Sharon Cahill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Janet Wynne
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Beatriz Kizer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Jerri Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Cyndi Herold
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Cindy Conley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Alissa Vorous
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Danielle Pierce
published 3
Ruthie Courville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcie Naughton + Martha Ruiz6351% games+0.5% vs expected
Sharon Cahill + Martha Ruiz3348% games−4.8% vs expected
Cindy Conley + Janet Wynne134 matchesnot enough data
Janet Wynne + Alissa Vorous044 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Shropshire + Jolena Tu224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Allen + Ruthie Courville033 matchesnot enough data
Janet Wynne + Beatriz Kizer213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Liskow + Jolena Tu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Ruiz
36W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Marcie Naughton
25W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Allen
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jolena Tu
17W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Katherine Rowe
14W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Liskow
20W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Lisa Mccarty
7W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Andrea Shropshire
18W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
Sharon Cahill
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Janet Wynne
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Beatriz Kizer
13W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jerri Jacobs
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cyndi Herold
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cindy Conley
11W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
Alissa Vorous
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Danielle Pierce
4W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruthie Courville
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.