Teams

Westchester - Mid Court Crisis

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Westchester - Mid Court Crisis000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kenzie Malkemes
published
3.05
Nancy Nguyen
published
2.99
Jean Bedrossian
published
2.97
Erin Lumpkin
published
2.97
Lauren Hoes
published
2.72
Ashley Coggins
published 3
2.72
Kristin McWilliams
published
2.57
Allison Slack
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenzie Malkemes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Nancy Nguyen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jean Bedrossian
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Erin Lumpkin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lauren Hoes
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Ashley Coggins
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Kristin McWilliams
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Allison Slack
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.