Teams

SRTC Williams

2023 OH OV FALL A18&O · Fall 3.0 Women Weekend Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-10-29vs WPAFB KurtzWon 31
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Katrus / Melinda Burton vs Cindy Polander / Molly McKenna2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Holbrook vs Laina Livingston6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy Williams / Lois Wood vs Annette Hanf / Jane Johnston4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Watkins / Tricia Fahrenholz vs Annette Oakes / Jo Bouchard6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 3.0 Women Weekend Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Karen Hoffman
published
2.99
Melinda Burton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Beth Wager
published 3
2.87
Tricia Fahrenholz
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.79
Lynn Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Christianna Mcname
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elisabeth Katrus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Lois Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Susan Holbrook
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Leila Quigley
published
Maureen Murphy
published
Melissa Deshurko
published
Tracy Williams
published
VIcky Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christianna Mcname + Lois Wood4165% games+19.8% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + VIcky Lee3354% games+9.8% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Elisabeth Katrus5258% games+3.8% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Melinda Burton2450% games+2.9% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Karen Hoffman6653% games+2.7% vs expected
Elisabeth Katrus + Karen Hoffman7652% games−2.8% vs expected
Tracy Williams + Lois Wood4164% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hoffman + Lois Wood2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Hoffman
68W–88L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Melinda Burton
65W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Beth Wager
54W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Tricia Fahrenholz
78W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Lynn Watkins
75W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Christianna Mcname
30W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Elisabeth Katrus
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lois Wood
35W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Susan Holbrook
48W–32L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%30%70%
2.57
Leila Quigley
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Murphy
1W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Deshurko
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Williams
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
VIcky Lee
43W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.