Teams

GT Ball Brayers

2024 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Scalcucci / Cynthia Norwood vs Angela Stewart / Linda Armiak7-6, 6-4
2024-03-02vs LWR Slice Slice BabyLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristen Tooley / Wendi Chapman vs Christie Uihlein / DeAnne Fischer4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Carrie Scalcucci vs Krista Sprungman / Kristine Scott2-6, 1-6
2024-02-17vs River Strand SherrLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Heather Boccia / Jenny Sherr5-7, 4-6
2024-02-10vs SSC Net NinjasWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Simotes / Carrie Scalcucci vs Kelly Anderson / Mona Harrington6-1, 6-0
2024-01-27vs SSC WindsorWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristen Tooley / Rebecca Gibson vs Kathy Sawyer / Elizabeth Micek4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Simotes / Carrie Scalcucci vs Brittany Blackman / Lori Madden6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-20vs LWN ArringtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie DuDeVoire / Carrie Scalcucci vs Sherry Chase / Sheila Weiss1-6, 3-6
2024-01-13vs Laurel Oak KrotkyWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendi Chapman / Christen Tooley vs Leanne McWilliams / Alicia Cohler6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.52
Christen Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published
3.43
Cecile Wooster
published 3.5
3.40
Margaret Kirkland
published
3.40
Lisa Simotes
published
3.33
Wendi Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Mariam Chilton
published
3.24
Victoria Campbell
published
3.03
Carrie Scalcucci
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Terry Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christen Tooley + Wendi Chapman41147% games−7.5% vs expected
Terry Olsen + Carrie Scalcucci134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Christen Tooley
60W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Cecile Wooster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Margaret Kirkland
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lisa Simotes
41W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Wendi Chapman
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Mariam Chilton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Victoria Campbell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carrie Scalcucci
42W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Terry Olsen
80W–129L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.