Teams

Wexford Smashers

Adult Team Tennis · 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jake Gartner
published
3.64
Cynthia Duvall
published 4
3.50
Susan Geist
published
3.37
Elisa Hall
published
3.33
Sam Carucci
published
3.30
Mark Musto
published
3.23
Susan Minter
published
3.18
Bobbie Arlotta
published 3.5
3.17
Ashley Halloran
published 3.5
3.09
Paul Halloran
published
3.07
Christen Smith
published 3.5
3.02
Carolyn Dillaway
published 3.5
3.02
Scott Geist
published
2.98
Doug Watson
published
2.96
Gilliane Mossing
published
2.93
Deborah Lasota
published 3.5
2.81
Jaime Seale
published
2.81
Karl Brondell
published
2.79
Drew Seale
published
2.73
Martin Hahn
published
2.66
Cheryl Hahn
published 3
2.60
Laura Levine
published
2.52
Connie Watson
published 3
Marion Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Minter + Elisa Hall11754% games−4.1% vs expected
Deborah Lasota + Bobbie Arlotta1643% games−7.8% vs expected
Deborah Lasota + Elisa Hall2546% games−12.9% vs expected
Susan Minter + Deborah Lasota123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Minter + Marion Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Lasota + Christen Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Elisa Hall + Susan Geist123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Gartner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Cynthia Duvall
64W–42L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
Susan Geist
47W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Elisa Hall
58W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sam Carucci
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Mark Musto
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Susan Minter
30W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Bobbie Arlotta
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Halloran
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Paul Halloran
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Christen Smith
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolyn Dillaway
26W–16L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Scott Geist
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.02
Doug Watson
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Gilliane Mossing
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3.5
Deborah Lasota
14W–38L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Jaime Seale
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Karl Brondell
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Drew Seale
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.79
Martin Hahn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cheryl Hahn
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Laura Levine
22W–37L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Connie Watson
12W–30L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
2.52
Marion Brown
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.