Teams

Hayes

2022 Anne Arundel Singles · Adult Singles Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-10-22Split 11
L#2 SinglesTina Rohm vs Anh Le2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTamara Hayes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-17vs CoadyWon 10
W#2 SinglesTina Rohm vs Lisa Walsh4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-15vs CoadySplit 11
W#1 SinglesTina Rohm vs Jenny Lopez6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Teresa Russin3-6, 2-6
2022-10-11vs CoadyLost 02
L#1 SinglesTina Rohm vs Lisa Mendenhall7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTamara Hayes vs Lisa Walsh4-6, 5-7
2022-10-09vs ArnoldLost 01
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Maria Birnkammer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-03vs CoadyLost 02
L#2 SinglesTina Rohm vs Jenny Lopez5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTamara Hayes vs Lisa Walsh1-6, 3-6
2022-10-01vs WalkoLost 02
L#1 SinglesTina Rohm vs Sherry Orebaugh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTamara Hayes vs Kimberly Walko6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-09-25vs WalkoLost 01
L#1 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Adrienne Dilaimy3-6, 0-6
2022-09-17vs ArnoldWon 20
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Kristin Draper6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKaye Witting vs Leann Gibbs6-2, 6-1
2022-08-27vs ArnoldLost 02
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Kristin Draper7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKaye Witting vs Leann Gibbs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-20Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTina Rohm vs Kristine Chesney4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Anh Le2-6, 3-6
2022-08-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Karen Flack6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Singles Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Tina Rohm
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.52
Shana Ahmad
published
3.35
Lezlie Moreland
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Reinhart
published
2.98
Tamara Hayes
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kaye Witting
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Rohm
130W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Shana Ahmad
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Meghan Reinhart
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Tamara Hayes
78W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Kaye Witting
66W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.