Teams

Dare Doubles

2025 Corpus Christi COMBO USTA League · Ladies 7.5 Flight

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-23vs Shot SistersLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Aldrighetti / Emily Hellums vs Denise Garrett / Stacy Hinze3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Pina / Lucero Escutia vs Audra Chester / Jeannel Hinton2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Griffin / Laura Konecne vs Jane Huston / Jonna Davidson2-6, 5-7
2025-08-23vs Slice Slice BabyWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Hellums / Debbie Aldrighetti vs Hope Castaneda / Brittany Moyers6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Pina / Lucero Escutia vs Ajia Fielden / Briana Torres7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Griffin / Vicki Jamison vs Katherine Sandoval / Monisha Madappa6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 7.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Debbie Aldrighetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Rebecca Pina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Linda Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Susan Temple
published
3.69
Emily Hellums
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Laura Konecne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Mary Lupe Arana
published
3.18
Vicki Jamison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lucero Escutia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Pina + Susan Temple2354% games−1.6% vs expected
Rebecca Pina + Debbie Aldrighetti3259% games−3.5% vs expected
Emily Hellums + Lucero Escutia303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Temple + Debbie Aldrighetti303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Aldrighetti + Mary Lupe Arana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Aldrighetti
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Rebecca Pina
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Linda Griffin
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Susan Temple
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Emily Hellums
38W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Laura Konecne
30W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Mary Lupe Arana
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Vicki Jamison
44W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Lucero Escutia
43W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.