Teams

Chili Peppers

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-06-13vs Martin 4.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Teresa Pedley3-6, 4-6
2023-06-11vs The Vicious VolliesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Lezlie Moreland vs Diem Salmon / Danette Williams4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-07vs AceAceBabyLost 01
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Adrienne Dilaimy3-6, 2-6
2023-06-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Veronica Townsend6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-04vs OverServed 2023Split 11
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Anh Le1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Daryl Williams6-3, 6-3
2023-06-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Shawna Mudd6-3, 3-2
2023-05-31vs AceAceBabyLost 01
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Shana Ahmad2-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs Wagner/AndersonWon 10
W#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Lisa Marthens7-5, 7-5
2023-05-06vs Party at the NetLost 02
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Shawna Mudd4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLezlie Moreland vs Julie Dixon3-6, 2-6
2023-05-04vs The Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Jamaine Chisholm1-6, 1-6
2023-04-27vs Wagner/AndersonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKrista Swetz vs Christy Dupras4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jennifer Noronha
published
3.80
Kathleen Garrett
published
3.73
PAULA SMITH
published
3.69
Tynika Wilson
published
3.56
Joanne Connelly
published
3.50
3.45
Jill Lehr
published
3.40
Krista Swetz
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.37
Lezlie Moreland
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.23
Tami Burt
published
3.19
Cindi Hodskins
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PAULA SMITH + Tynika Wilson201850% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Noronha
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Kathleen Garrett
44W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
PAULA SMITH
48W–32L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Tynika Wilson
22W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jill Lehr
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
3.5
Krista Swetz
41W–53L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Tami Burt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Cindi Hodskins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.