Teams

Sarno - Dwyer

2022 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Emily Criste vs Janet Stiles / Shelley Anderson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bray / Courtney Thomassen vs Janie McDermott / Geri James6-3, 6-3
2022-08-22vs TTC - LeiterWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Emily Criste vs Donna Urbanek / Xu Sue Huang6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bray / Courtney Thomassen vs Sherry Houston / Karen Kelly6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Graham / Tee Wells vs Julia Tulloch / Anne Barto6-0, 3-1
2022-08-15vs Kiwi-SalvatoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesPauline Mitchell / Emily Criste vs Leesa Brambach / Tracey Draper3-6, 5-7
2022-08-08vs Suntree - BeanWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Cynthia Simmons vs Mary Ehrhard / Stephanie McIntosh5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-07-28vs Fee -LuerWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Cynthia Simmons vs Michele Heyn / Lauren Ranew6-2, 7-5
2022-07-25vs Rockledge - MelendezLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Tee Wells vs Gisela Alcalde / Sandy Dahl2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-11vs TTC -SellersWon 20
W#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Tee Wells vs Patty Sellers / Debbie Chamberlain6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPauline Mitchell / Emily Criste vs Carol Whalen / Susan Wilkes3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-27vs Brevard - Viera R P/HeltonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Courtney Thomassen vs Deena Helton / Sara Hatfield6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Courtney Thomassen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Wendy Hart
published
3.40
Emily Dwyer
published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
published 3.5
3.16
Kim Johnson
published
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.05
Bonita Madden
published 3
Melissa Dwyer
published
Pauline Mitchell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Criste + Courtney Thomassen6354% games+13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Wendy Hart
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Emily Dwyer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Kim Johnson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Bonita Madden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Melissa Dwyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pauline Mitchell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.