Teams

Rubino/ManteoHS/7.5MensCombo

OBX COMBO 18 &over · 7.5 MEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 8 6:00 PM
Family Recreation Park
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Manteo High School Tennis Courts
Sep 22 6:00 PM
Family Recreation Park
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Family Recreation Park
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Manteo High School Tennis Courts
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Family Recreation Park
2026-08-25vs Stathis/Parks&Rec/7.5MensComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarton Grover / Robert Farmer vs Nicholas Stathis / Kevin Zygler4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Piorkowski / Bo Rhodes vs Steve Thompson / Brock Felton4-6, 3-6
2026-08-18vs Stathis/Parks&Rec/7.5MensComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Piorkowski / Russ Sarbora vs Brock Felton / Maeyan Golasa6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Coplan / Robert Gomez vs Kevin McKeever / Kevin Zygler6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stathis/Parks&Rec/7.5MensCombo1021319
2Rubino/ManteoHS/7.5MensCombo0112431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Ross Stevens
published
3.72
Barton Grover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Brian Rubino
published 3.5
3.47
David Coplan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Paul Amble
published
3.38
Larry Wall
published
3.35
Robert Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Russ Sarbora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Bo Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
James Piorkowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Robert Farmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russ Sarbora + David Coplan3250% games−3.6% vs expected
Brian Rubino + Bo Rhodes2646% games−10.2% vs expected
Brian Rubino + Russ Sarbora213 matchesnot enough data
David Coplan + Robert Farmer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ross Stevens
10W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Barton Grover
4W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Brian Rubino
34W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
David Coplan
37W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Paul Amble
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Larry Wall
20W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Robert Gomez
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Russ Sarbora
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bo Rhodes
31W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
James Piorkowski
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.29
Robert Farmer
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.