Teams

Isles Of Collier - S. Davis

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Cynthia Grant vs Susan Julich / Ricki Giersch4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Koole / Kathleen Griffin vs Lisa Campbell / Inge Lund2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Barrett / Dori Olson vs Shirley Steffen / Sarah Griffin3-6, 1-6
2025-02-27vs The Glades / J.KellyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Kelly Deufel vs Christine Baumann / KASSIE KESSINGER3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCynthia Grant / Linda Koole vs Greta Takach / Julie Kelly6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Joyce Perry vs Christine Mcallen / Jacqueline Millar2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-20vs Cambier / TrombleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Koole / Joan Barrett vs Carol Cohen / Julia Lannon2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Crum / Pamela Ginzburg vs Karen Sieffert / Lorraine Kaplan5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLouise Decker / Cynthia Grant vs Linda Stovall / Margaret Finn6-1, 6-3
2025-02-13vs Fiddlers Creek / L.KeelySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Koole / Louise Decker vs Dorothea Farmer / Laura Krueger4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Crum / Pamela Ginzburg vs Susan Burgess / Dawn Cooper7-6, 7-6
L#1 DoublesKathy O'Connell / Marlea Bowser vs Shirley Steffen / Susan Julich5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Koole / Kathleen Griffin vs Inge Lund / Ana Cecilia Isaza6-1, 6-4
2025-01-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesNina Savoca / Susan Crum vs Jacqueline Millar / Linda Collamore6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Barrett / Tammy Boone vs Julie Kelly / Greta Takach6-0, 6-2
2025-01-16vs Cambier / TrombleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Linda Koole vs Lorraine Kaplan / Brenda Smith6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCynthia Grant / Joyce Perry vs Eileen Komanecky / Karen Sieffert3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Kathleen Griffin vs Linda Stovall / Virginia Southall6-1, 7-5
2025-01-09vs Fiddlers Creek / L.KeelySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Deufel / Louise Decker vs Linda Keely / Jan Kolesar1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoan Barrett / Nina Savoca vs Marianne Gaffney / Dawn Cooper6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kathleen Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Joan Barrett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Linda Koole
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Ginzburg
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Marlea Bowser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Cynthia Grant
published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Deufel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dori Olson
published
Joyce Perry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Louise Decker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nina Savoca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Davis
published
Susan Crum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tammy Boone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Griffin + Linda Koole12753% games−4.5% vs expected
Marlea Bowser + Cheryl Rauch8352% gamesnot enough data
Louise Decker + Linda Koole6454% gamesnot enough data
Joan Barrett + Linda Koole5351% gamesnot enough data
Susan Crum + Pamela Ginzburg5353% gamesnot enough data
Marlea Bowser + Linda Koole5258% gamesnot enough data
Marlea Bowser + Kelly Deufel5256% gamesnot enough data
Louise Decker + Cheryl Rauch2456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathleen Griffin
44W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Joan Barrett
159W–116L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Linda Koole
123W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Pamela Ginzburg
98W–87L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Marlea Bowser
168W–139L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cynthia Grant
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kelly Deufel
89W–134L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Dori Olson
28W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Elaine Leffingwell-King
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Perry
40W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Decker
47W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Savoca
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Davis
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Crum
53W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Boone
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.