Teams

Robbins

Combo · 7.5 Mens

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-20vs AulisaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Robbins / Spencer Smith vs Carson Smith / John Kyle Wooldridge0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTrevas Cruz / Jamie Rendon vs Keith Dixon / John Chad Carter6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJaime Ayala / Christopher Gregorcyk vs Rocco Testini / John Gardner2-6, 3-6
2026-08-13vs AulisaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJaime Ayala / Christopher Gregorcyk vs Keith Dixon / Salomon Oliveros Parra2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTales Vieira / Hayden Farquhar vs Carson Smith / Eugenio Aulisa7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTrevas Cruz / Alexander Blake vs Rocco Testini / AJ Funk6-3, 6-4
2026-08-06vs AulisaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrevas Cruz / Alexander Blake vs Rocco Testini / Salomon Oliveros Parra6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLonnie Williams / Jamie Rendon vs Carson Smith / AJ Funk4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHayden Farquhar / Tales Vieira vs Keith Dixon / John Kyle Wooldridge7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Mens
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Robbins21451090
2Aulisa1254977

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Trevas Cruz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Alexander Blake
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.58
Tales Vieira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Lonnie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jamie Rendon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jaime Ayala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Randy Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Hayden Farquhar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Christopher Gregorcyk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Holly Robbins
published
Spencer Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevas Cruz
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Alexander Blake
18W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
Tales Vieira
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lonnie Williams
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jamie Rendon
23W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Jaime Ayala
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Randy Robbins
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Hayden Farquhar
21W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Christopher Gregorcyk
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Holly Robbins
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Spencer Smith
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.