← Teams

GLVR-Wellman/Ritchie

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Rachel Ritchie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Rachel Novak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Thu Truong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.66
HOLLY LIBERATORE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Christina Melander
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Kari Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-03-01Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesKari Hastings / Satomi Stogdill vs Kelly Mohr / Flor Harrigan6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Angelina Warriner6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Julie Bradford vs Rie Sasakawa / Dongju Won1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Sellke / Rachel Novak vs Angie Lee / Julie Hansen6-0, 6-2
2025-02-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesThu Truong / HOLLY LIBERATORE vs Kristi Vargas / Heike Droste6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Ritchie vs Suzanne Chambers6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Satomi Stogdill vs Edwardeen Hilts / Kate Leatherbarrow6-4, 6-2
2025-02-15Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Aracelia Hettle6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKari Hastings / Satomi Stogdill vs Kirsten Giacomini / Carrie Fisher7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Novak / Thu Truong vs Lynn Sosa / Hong Huynh6-2, 6-1
2025-02-08Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Kari Hastings vs Lisa Klein / Shelly Perkins7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Ritchie / Thu Truong vs Linda Graham / Allison Schenk6-3, 6-0
2025-02-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesThu Truong / HOLLY LIBERATORE vs Puntrigar Suriyaseang / Lori D'Antonio6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Jannell Cuddy6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Rachel Novak vs Kelley Gaylor / Jacqueline Wilcox7-5, 7-5
2025-01-17Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Rachel Novak vs Morgan Towle / Kathleen Goodfriend6-4, 6-3
2025-01-11Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesHOLLY LIBERATORE / Thu Truong vs Donna Roisom / Marie Picard6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesRachel Ritchie vs Tami McAra7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachel Novak / Satomi Stogdill vs Tami Oglesby / Christy Grisham7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Melander / Fiona Tait vs Penny Birkhofer / Cathryn Hansen6-4, 6-0
2025-01-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHOLLY LIBERATORE / Kari Hastings vs Clarice Brown / Michelle Doherty4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Katie Jurgenson7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Casey / Marie Sellke vs Michelle Posey / Deana Julka6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Rachel Ritchie
75W–19L career
0%67%33%
4.05
4
Rachel Novak
71W–39L career
1%98%0%
3.73
4
Thu Truong
85W–46L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
HOLLY LIBERATORE
123W–75L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Christina Melander
111W–81L career
4%96%0%
3.66
3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Kari Hastings
88W–75L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.